I don’t go around correcting someone’s grammar or writing skills unless my job requires it. Here’s a disclaimer, I’m not a Grammar Nazi. It does save a lot of time, and at least 6 out of 10 recommendations made by the algorithm are right. You need to have a decent understanding of the English language to use Grammarly as per your requirement and reap the benefits. I learned my lesson of not following Grammarly blindly and using my own judgment to accept a recommendation made by the algorithm or reject it.Īlthough I had one scarring experience with Grammarly, I would still call it one of the best Grammar checkers and editing tools on the market. The second time worked like a charm, and my draft passed through the editorial check on the client’s website.
I again ran through the second draft on Grammarly, but I was mindful of only accepting recommendations around spellchecks and punctuations this time. Instead of applying every recommendation popping up in Grammarly, I went back and made all those edits by myself. I checked the recommendations of the editor, and to my surprise, they were legit. Nothing can give more anxiety to a writer than suggestions about the grammar accuracy of their write-up. And some of those errors were grammatical. I made the edits recommended by Grammarly.Īfter submitting the first draft, I received a long list of edits marked by the editor of the website. Before submitting it, I decided to run it through Grammarly. I followed the guideline and completed the first article.
On that note, let me share an anecdote with you.Ī few months back, I started working with a client who had a distinct guideline outlined for the writers. It is NOT a substitute for the human eye.
Grammarly isn’t flawless, but it can detect many errors in your work and provide various recommendations to help you improve your writing. Human editors use their judgment to ignore such suggestions and edit the document as per the context. Grammarly’s algorithm struggles to understand the context, which starts a string of inappropriate suggestions.
#Grammarly web editor software#
It is still an AI-backed software that has a lot of catching up to do before taking the place of a human editor.Īs human editors, we are better judges of the tone and choice of words.įor writers, context is the driving force of their content. There are specific issues with Grammarly too…Īfter using Grammarly for over three years, I have come to understand that even though Grammarly is a sound editing tool, one should not entirely rely on its suggestions. In addition to fixing errors in the text you’re working on, the application enhances your writing abilities.īut, not everything is good in the editing paradise. I sure found out about shortcomings in my writing, such as: This feature helps in enhancing your writing and editing skills. You can even comprehend your poor writing tendencies with its weekly reports. It is exceptionally accurate and outperforms most grammar/spellcheck software. Grammarly detects the majority of errors and makes recommendations to enhance the quality of your writing. Here’s a summary of my personal experience using Grammarly. When you’ve spent money on an editing tool to make your writing flawless, it’s natural to question its accuracy and consistency. Of course, as a writer, I wanted Grammarly to specifically help me with finding sentence fragmentation, punctuations, flow, and more. Through the course of moving to a paid version of Grammarly, I wanted to be entirely sure about the accuracy of the tool.
#Grammarly web editor free#
The dangers of investing in writing aidĬoncerning my personal experience with Grammarly, I have initially used the free tool but later shifted to the premium version.
0 kommentar(er)
